- Free Culture?
- so made should be an aspiration for all fight. As free medicine, free housing, free newspapers and entertainment ...
- But then the pharmaceutical, entertainment, construction ...
- and publishing groups and intermediaries ...
- Do what we talk about then?
- Always economic interests. Also in this free culture. That pays benefits to companies such as Telefonica, user services and portals that control through certain multinational technology companies, telecommunications monopolies and manufacturers and sellers of technology and digital devices. But someone can be so naive to not think that behind those who stoke the culture calling for free no hidden pirates who always fish in troubled waters waving their interests? Those who today call for free-culture advocates, employers, brokers of all kinds-culture I care as much as Bush, all I want is to multiply their profits.
- And the creators?
- They are presented as the bad guys when they are in turn exploited by those who claim to defend their interests, publishers, film or music business, etc. course, the culture should be free, but that is impossible in a rotten society as we live , of \u200b\u200bcourse that should not be the public domain or nor a more or less direct heirs followed for 70 or 80 years the work of his predecessors, but neither should be the hereditary monarchy, the estates extending for centuries a handful of parasites, the ancient tributes, benefits millionaire bankers, builders, immunity from tax havens, lifetime possessions of the Church ... Time to talk about what is real, to know the reasons why we fight and flee interested demagoguery. Is the market does not impose such a totalitarian censorship for art and culture? Do newspapers, information, literary and artistic criticism are not mediated by the companies that dominate the media, with its capital, with its advertising portfolio, always serving specific and more often spurious interests?. Governs us fear, submission, advertising, global economic power, military and police, justice reactionary and archaic laws, theocracy destructive of thought and freedom. And the demagoguery, exerted mainly on young people, the most exploited by the society.
- You should know who is to rebel against. Do not be fooled, they know a lot of manipulation of fascism. And Aznar, Arenas, Cospedal above claim to speak on behalf of the poor, pensioners, the unemployed ... Enough of sarcasm and demagoguery legacy of Hitler and Mussolini in power, who then checked where these stories lead.
And the so-called law Sinde . Neither with repression and intimidation, or laws that they believe that justice works and is also justice, or blind obedience in the markets, advances, rather keep the barbarism of today called progress. But let the interests of the so-called cultural industries should be fought in unison by those who scream free culture and believe that is a road network for its consumer cravings, when accepting a drink, pay for any show, for watching football on TV, let alone by the other chapters of his life, and the creators and artists that if respect for their work and aspire to personal freedom, they should also fight. Neither speak for us name. Let's talk about Internet and culture .
"Nobody doubts the appeal of this medium of information and opinion not only for those who for their economic difficulties may find there affordable cultural products quickly or could not buy, but also for freedom of expression that can mean . But not without risks than just talking. So we seek freedom in the network, but fight the gangsters who try and control it. Because as important or more to the real creator of today or yesterday to protect their intellectual property rights is to defend against any new monopolies of information, censorship and artistic and aesthetic manipulation that may suffer under anything goes on their artistic or literary works. Gaps also contrasted the hasty law is not an open dialogue with the plurality of thought, which have little to do with the interests of Alejandro Sanz, Sabina, Perez Reverte, etc, with other names, also in this issue. And thousands of questions that could arise on these issues. Like, why are not regulated controls on works to prevent cultural looting, why they allow so-called public benefit only benefice publishers and entrepreneurs? And now they want to bring the work to the new market network, who regulates their prices, profits, which again paints the author always subject to a chain of intermediaries? And the laws are just looking for guilt in the weak. Is a bit like prostitution, illegal migration, drug trafficking, victims are persecuted and protected to the mafias that control these businesses, including entrepreneurs, large or small, operating for years, for example women and immigrants, and the authorities cooperating with them or turn a blind eye, as happens in deaths from accidents. So when it comes to prosecuting users here or on the issue of drug use, it makes you shudder at the legal repulsion or social means.
- When considering the need for monitoring to prevent it violated the work of a creator, denying the right of the payment for the use of their works, except that it voluntarily resign, and hard to imagine a society in which technical, banking, not to mention lawyers, judges, doctors, architects, would accept for the good because it is perhaps a benefit to society, while we think of the millions of euros annually now earn owners These web links which claim to offer free cultural products, products they have created. And the publicity that they generated, and the use made of data Personal Internet for other purposes?. Because they offer certain public works, then talk about blogging, they serve individuals and multinational business interests.
- Say, while intellectual property laws, as if the laws were sacred and respected as the most believers do not for example the fuck out of wedlock, are something that the publishing world is failing from their different enactments , say for example the roll control, royalty payments, fraud involving the transfer of business, the deceit and corruption of most literary prizes. And the Internet does not leave to find something similar concentrations economic elites, interests and political controls, and demagoguery to consumers.
More questions than answers.
- Much of the blame for the current situation have no doubt, as has happened in the field of construction-industry sectors have sought only profit at the expense of the book, disc, film, and talk of big business and not the exception.
- In the campaign against the rights of authors examines the helplessness of these, which are the majority, not the few dozen that dominate the media and therefore should not complain, because most developers just can edit their works, without any social security, unemployment tend to be cyclical or not continuous power or evil ends meet creations and are subject to the dictatorship of a market ideology, political and especially business, led by advertising them away from any kind of benefits.
Somehow you need a control-never on the citizens, but on businesses, their blogs, which are those who traffic in intellectual property. And also on the private copying levy that affects manufacturers, importers especially in Spain, printers, copiers, scanners, multifunction devices, and they can not charge those who use them, because you can not tell those who use legal or illegal copying, so that there are licenses to authorize reproduce works and reward their authors for any injury that causes them apart from competing demands of health care and social assistance not covered by any social security.
- It is unacceptable that the books we now refer to them-without the permission of their authors, can move freely and even transformed or adapted "to the taste or the occurrence" of that manipulation which would otherwise harmful perhaps the most grim of censorship " to any reader or just curious to appropriate them.
Nobody argues that a physicist, mathematician, sociologist, a farmer, he was not paid for their work, whether research or production. Do the creators have to be aliens from another world? Is your time, effort, his work, they should not have a price? "Only they must live on air and deliver your work for free? About the culture demanded it gratris live in a bubble of air fed only of culture, and outside there are thousands of needs that have to pay, with a difference, culture is not exploitative, it is within the leisure which is free and voluntary and multiple, and within this entertainment should not consider be free to attend a football game or a concert at Disneyland?.
- which in turn can access the internet through this medium, at least until now, to avoid censorship and ideological control and creative, literary or artistic, or simply do not politically correct and place it there, free and aprevecharse all who wish it, but sometimes it ends up being the only consumer. In the network there are possibilities beyond the tyranny of the market-hence the proliferation of literary blogs-for literary and artistic creation. The risk is that without diffusion, may be sentenced its author to the silence and solitude, shouting in a vacuum.
- There is also the problem of deterioration of language and originality of the author and helplessness before the manipulation and distortion of his work possible.
Issues and minimum first raised at a debate that should be open, because culture can not become an excuse to help bury the thought and freedom, nor resign to become an increasingly good degraded and brutish.
0 comments:
Post a Comment